White House Officials Admit Abortion, Tiller Holding Up Kathleen Sebelius Pickby Steven ErteltFebruary 26, 2009
http://www.lifenews.com/nat4860.html
Kathleen Sebilius' buddy and partner in crimes against humanity is George Tiller. She tried and tried to bennefit his child killing business as much as she could. She, even vetoed a bill to get him off of criminal charges of performing illegal late term abortions and even killed the mothers in a few cases. Late-Term Abortion Practitioner George Tiller Will Stand Trial After Court Ruling
http://www.lifenews.com/state3896.html
KS Board of Healing Arts Asked to Reopen Inquiry into Abortion Death
http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/132709388....
Kansas Gov Kathleen Sebelius Held Secret Event With Late-Term AbortionistExcerpt:"Every agency in Kansas that could hold Tiller accountable for illegal late-term abortions, from the Board of Healing Arts to the Kansas Supreme Court to the Attorney General, are all laced with Sebelius appointees. It is little wonder that they all have done nothing but stall and obstruct efforts to prosecute him," Newman concluded.
http://www.lifenews.com/state3266.html
Obama Nominates Abortion Industry’s Top Governor
by Jennifer Giroux
03/02/2009
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30903
What does it profit a person if you gain the whole world and lose your soul????
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
URGES CATHOLICS TO FIGHT SOCIALISM; Father Vaughan Sees It Rising as a Great Wave Threatening Christianity
Excerpt from Father Vaughan's Article in the New York Times on March 25th, 1912:
"The Socialists say they do not care about our star land. We tell them we do not care about their mud land. They hold that this world is no drill place, but a pleasure ground, with roses, roses, roses all the way, and no rose with a briar. They would pluck the fruit and believe there is no forbidden fruit. Poor little third rate planet! You're making too much of it, my friends. You cannot stop sin and death, my brethren, and of what use is Socialism on a deathbed, which for the Catholic is the beginning of life and for the Socialist the end of life?
Oh, let us try to tear out of this country this poisonous thing called Socialism. Let us try to win its followers. With all our energy let us try to win them from this petty thing that offers them no home, no welcome, no friends to greet them on the doorstep."
My comment:
It seems we American Catholics, have failed in this mission, with so many Catholics supporting anti-Catholic policies and participating in the grave sins of abortion, euthanasia, physician-assisted suidide and embryonic stem cell research. 54% of American Catholics voted for the evil of this Death Culture president and for evils of Socialism where persons become as objects to be discarded/killed when the state has no use for them or they become too burdensome/costly. There is a lot of blood on American Catholic's hands, yes indeed. I guess killing 4000 innocent children a day in the U.S. alone was not enough...now we go out into the world to kill more defenseless little boys and girls and promote our disgusting Socialist Death Culture at the U.N. too.
http://www.freerepublic.com/^http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9804E5DB1F31E233A25756C2A9659C946396D6CF
"The Socialists say they do not care about our star land. We tell them we do not care about their mud land. They hold that this world is no drill place, but a pleasure ground, with roses, roses, roses all the way, and no rose with a briar. They would pluck the fruit and believe there is no forbidden fruit. Poor little third rate planet! You're making too much of it, my friends. You cannot stop sin and death, my brethren, and of what use is Socialism on a deathbed, which for the Catholic is the beginning of life and for the Socialist the end of life?
Oh, let us try to tear out of this country this poisonous thing called Socialism. Let us try to win its followers. With all our energy let us try to win them from this petty thing that offers them no home, no welcome, no friends to greet them on the doorstep."
My comment:
It seems we American Catholics, have failed in this mission, with so many Catholics supporting anti-Catholic policies and participating in the grave sins of abortion, euthanasia, physician-assisted suidide and embryonic stem cell research. 54% of American Catholics voted for the evil of this Death Culture president and for evils of Socialism where persons become as objects to be discarded/killed when the state has no use for them or they become too burdensome/costly. There is a lot of blood on American Catholic's hands, yes indeed. I guess killing 4000 innocent children a day in the U.S. alone was not enough...now we go out into the world to kill more defenseless little boys and girls and promote our disgusting Socialist Death Culture at the U.N. too.
http://www.freerepublic.com/^http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9804E5DB1F31E233A25756C2A9659C946396D6CF
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
It is not too early to start impeachment proceedings!
Neo-Liberal policy does not encourage people to become expert, indeed it discourages them, and it denies any experts additional rewards for their individual efforts. This is the Nanny State and this is Obama's America and he of course and obviously is no expert but is a novice and will never be anything but. This transition to "Change" would be extremely disturbing, were to to go to fruition. It would be almost like finding out there is no God - I could lose everything I believe in. Fortunately, I know there is God and my mind is at peace, because there is justice for everyone, including Barack Hussein Obama.
In Lennon's utopia, the industrious, the lazy, the expert, the incompetent, the chaste, the promiscuous, the good, the evil and the complacent all share all the world equally. In the Marxist Obama's world, it is the same utopia he seeks, but will never find. However, this incompetenat man has been elected by the lazy, the incompetant, the promiscuous, the evil and the complacent.
Barack Hussein Obama has absolutely no integrity and no experience and he is in way too far over his head and he is already struggling for air. However, any dissenters in his organization of socialist thugs, I fear, will certainly be forcefully silenced - they will not be allowed to discuss his inadequacy nor his inexperience nor the truth behind his sinister plans.
Obama is now engaging in illegal and unconstitutional tactics to take contol of the census:
..........................................................................................................................Obama Shifts Census Bureau Oversight, Triggering Angry Protest By RepublicansFriday, Feb. 6, 2009
President Obama has decided to bring the U.S. Census Bureau under White House jurisdiction, a move that incensed House Republicans, who fired off a blistering letter to him Thursday, calling it "outrageous and unprecedented" and a "blatant partisan and political maneuver."The move would shift the chain of command with the bureau and the Commerce Department, where the bureau currently resides. It comes after the Congressional Black Caucus, National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials and other groups expressed displeasure with Obama's nominee for Commerce secretary, Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.Gregg, the groups said this week, opposed efforts to secure emergency funding for the 2000 Census, which they asserted exposes a potential lack of commitment to ensuring that hard-to-reach minority populations are properly accounted for in the 2010 census.A White House spokesman confirmed Thursday that Obama plans to work closely with the bureau, which will remain within the Commerce Department."From the first days of the transition the census has been a priority for the president, and a process he wanted to re-evaluate," the spokesman said in a prepared statement."There is historic precedent for the director of the census, who works for the Commerce secretary and the president, to work closely with White House senior management -- given the number of decisions that will have to be put before the president," he said. "We plan to return to that model in this administration."House Republicans reacted quickly. House Oversight and Government Reform ranking member Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Oversight and Government Reform Census Subcommittee ranking member Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., seized on speculation that the move would place the yet-unnamed Census Bureau director under the watchful eye of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, instead of leaving Gregg in charge.They suggested the move could improperly influence legislative redistricting, which is shaped by Census counts."By circumventing the secretary of Commerce's oversight of the Census Bureau and handing it directly to a political operative such as Mr. Emanuel, you are severely jeopardizing the fairness and accuracy of the 2010 Census," Issa and McHenry wrote Obama.Details of the day-to-day relationship between the White House and the Census Bureau seem hazy.Aides speculated Thursday that the bureau's budget and public-affairs functions may be routed through OMB, an arrangement that would assuage the fears expressed by advocates concerned that the Census director's public statements and congressional testimony would be subject to censorship by less-than-supportive leadership at Commerce.Sources on both sides of the issue said black lawmakers and others interested in securing more funding for the 2010 Census had been hoping for assurances of support from Obama as soon as they learned about Gregg's possible selection to Commerce post.One Democratic aide close to the matter called the administration's decision a direct response to the grievances of minority groups upset with Gregg's appointment."People started yelling at them," said the aide, who added that the details of how the White House's interactions with the Census director remain woefully undefined."Their answer was 'OK, fine, [Gregg] won't be in charge,'" the aide said. "It wasn't a plan. It was a reaction."The administration's idea to shift jurisdiction over the Census Bureau was not entirely new.In September, congressional Democrats, led by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., proposed legislation to make the bureau an independent federal agency. Such agencies report directly to the president, as the Federal Emergency Management Agency did before it became part of the Homeland Security Department.A Census Bureau spokeswoman declined to comment on any organizational changes until a director is in place.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/cda_20090206_8228.php
Q: Is it too early to begin impeachment proceedings? A: No.
In Lennon's utopia, the industrious, the lazy, the expert, the incompetent, the chaste, the promiscuous, the good, the evil and the complacent all share all the world equally. In the Marxist Obama's world, it is the same utopia he seeks, but will never find. However, this incompetenat man has been elected by the lazy, the incompetant, the promiscuous, the evil and the complacent.
Barack Hussein Obama has absolutely no integrity and no experience and he is in way too far over his head and he is already struggling for air. However, any dissenters in his organization of socialist thugs, I fear, will certainly be forcefully silenced - they will not be allowed to discuss his inadequacy nor his inexperience nor the truth behind his sinister plans.
Obama is now engaging in illegal and unconstitutional tactics to take contol of the census:
..........................................................................................................................Obama Shifts Census Bureau Oversight, Triggering Angry Protest By RepublicansFriday, Feb. 6, 2009
President Obama has decided to bring the U.S. Census Bureau under White House jurisdiction, a move that incensed House Republicans, who fired off a blistering letter to him Thursday, calling it "outrageous and unprecedented" and a "blatant partisan and political maneuver."The move would shift the chain of command with the bureau and the Commerce Department, where the bureau currently resides. It comes after the Congressional Black Caucus, National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials and other groups expressed displeasure with Obama's nominee for Commerce secretary, Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.Gregg, the groups said this week, opposed efforts to secure emergency funding for the 2000 Census, which they asserted exposes a potential lack of commitment to ensuring that hard-to-reach minority populations are properly accounted for in the 2010 census.A White House spokesman confirmed Thursday that Obama plans to work closely with the bureau, which will remain within the Commerce Department."From the first days of the transition the census has been a priority for the president, and a process he wanted to re-evaluate," the spokesman said in a prepared statement."There is historic precedent for the director of the census, who works for the Commerce secretary and the president, to work closely with White House senior management -- given the number of decisions that will have to be put before the president," he said. "We plan to return to that model in this administration."House Republicans reacted quickly. House Oversight and Government Reform ranking member Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Oversight and Government Reform Census Subcommittee ranking member Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., seized on speculation that the move would place the yet-unnamed Census Bureau director under the watchful eye of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, instead of leaving Gregg in charge.They suggested the move could improperly influence legislative redistricting, which is shaped by Census counts."By circumventing the secretary of Commerce's oversight of the Census Bureau and handing it directly to a political operative such as Mr. Emanuel, you are severely jeopardizing the fairness and accuracy of the 2010 Census," Issa and McHenry wrote Obama.Details of the day-to-day relationship between the White House and the Census Bureau seem hazy.Aides speculated Thursday that the bureau's budget and public-affairs functions may be routed through OMB, an arrangement that would assuage the fears expressed by advocates concerned that the Census director's public statements and congressional testimony would be subject to censorship by less-than-supportive leadership at Commerce.Sources on both sides of the issue said black lawmakers and others interested in securing more funding for the 2010 Census had been hoping for assurances of support from Obama as soon as they learned about Gregg's possible selection to Commerce post.One Democratic aide close to the matter called the administration's decision a direct response to the grievances of minority groups upset with Gregg's appointment."People started yelling at them," said the aide, who added that the details of how the White House's interactions with the Census director remain woefully undefined."Their answer was 'OK, fine, [Gregg] won't be in charge,'" the aide said. "It wasn't a plan. It was a reaction."The administration's idea to shift jurisdiction over the Census Bureau was not entirely new.In September, congressional Democrats, led by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., proposed legislation to make the bureau an independent federal agency. Such agencies report directly to the president, as the Federal Emergency Management Agency did before it became part of the Homeland Security Department.A Census Bureau spokeswoman declined to comment on any organizational changes until a director is in place.
http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/cda_20090206_8228.php
Q: Is it too early to begin impeachment proceedings? A: No.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Each Year, 12 Percent More Boys and Young Men Are Diagnosed With HIV.
Did you get that? I hope so and I hope you take it to heart. Each year, from 2001 to 2006, 12 percent more boys and young men were diagnosed with HIV...and this is just of the males who have sex with males. The trend is straight uphill.
Our beautifully designed 14-year-old boys were created for this?
CDC WEEKLY - June 27, 2008 Trends in HIV/AIDS Diagnoses Among Men Who Have Sex with Men --- 33 States, 2001--2006
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5725a2.htm
In the United States, HIV infection and AIDS have had a tremendous effect on men who have sex with men (MSM). MSM accounted for 71% of all HIV infections among male adults and adolescents in 2005 (based on data from 33 states with long-term, confidential name-based HIV reporting), even though only about 5% to 7% of male adults and adolescents in the United States identify themselves as MSM.
HIV/AIDS among Men Who Have Sex with Men - CDC FACT SHEET - Revised June 2007
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/resources/factsheets/msm.htm
The Great Rainbow Robbery:Gay Activists Costing America Billions Of DollarsIn Medical Expenses To Pay For Unsafe Sex Practices
http://www.earstohear.net/Separation/HighCostofAIDS%20.html
Our beautifully designed 14-year-old boys were created for this?
CDC WEEKLY - June 27, 2008 Trends in HIV/AIDS Diagnoses Among Men Who Have Sex with Men --- 33 States, 2001--2006
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5725a2.htm
In the United States, HIV infection and AIDS have had a tremendous effect on men who have sex with men (MSM). MSM accounted for 71% of all HIV infections among male adults and adolescents in 2005 (based on data from 33 states with long-term, confidential name-based HIV reporting), even though only about 5% to 7% of male adults and adolescents in the United States identify themselves as MSM.
HIV/AIDS among Men Who Have Sex with Men - CDC FACT SHEET - Revised June 2007
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/resources/factsheets/msm.htm
The Great Rainbow Robbery:Gay Activists Costing America Billions Of DollarsIn Medical Expenses To Pay For Unsafe Sex Practices
http://www.earstohear.net/Separation/HighCostofAIDS%20.html
U.S. Fatherless
PREVALENCE OF SOLE (AND MATERNAL) CUSTODY
The proportion of children living with just one parent rose from 9% in 1960 to 25% in 1990.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Family Life Today...And How it has Changed" SB/92-13 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office: November 1992)
In 1993, 27% of children under 18 years old lived with only one parent, up from 12% in 1970.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Gap Narrows Between Children Living with a Divorced or Single Parent, Census Bureau Finds," by Arlene Saluter (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, July 20, 1994)
More than 90% of litigated divorces result in an award of sole custody to the mother.Source: 1991 Census Bureau
The number of children living only with mother grew from 8% (5.1 million) in 1960 to 23.3% (15.6 million) in 1993. Source: U.S. Congress, Committee on Ways and Means, "The Green Book" (Washington D.C., 1993); see also U.S. department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1993", by Arlene Saluter, Current Population Reports: Population Characteristics P20-478 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, May 1994).
The chances that a child born around 1980 will not be living with both biological parents at age 17 have increased to over 50%.Source: Donald J. Hernandez, "America's Children: Resources from Family, Government, and the Economy (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1993).
About 40% of the children who live in fatherless households haven't seen their fathers in at least a year. Of the remaining 60%, only 20% sleep even one night per month in the father's home. Only one in six sees their father an average of once or more per week.Source: Frank F. Furstenberg Jr. and Christing Winquist Nord, "Parenting Apart: Patterns of Child Rearing After Marital Disruption," Journal of Marriage and the Family (November 1985), p.896.
In disrupted families, only one child in six, on average, saw his or her father as often as once a week in the past year. Close to half did not see their father at all in the past year. As time goes on, contact becomes even more infrequent. Ten years after a marriage breaks up, more than two- thirds of children report not having seen their father for a year.Source: National Commission on Children, "Speaking of Kids: A National Survey of Children and Parents" (Washington, D.C., 1991).
With increasing numbers of children living with only their mothers, many children have tenuous or nonexistent relationships with their fathers. In a 1990 survey, only one-third of children in female-headed families reported seeing their fathers at least once a week. Nearly one in five children in female-headed families had not seen their fathers for five years.Source: National Commission on Children, "Speaking of Kids: A National Survey of Children and Parents (Washington, 1991).
The United States is now the world's leader in fatherless families. In 1986, the United States took over first place, when 24% of America's families were headed by a single parent, and today nearly 30% of families in the United States are headed by a single parent.Source: Alisa Burns, "Mother Headed Families: An International Perspective and the Case of Australia," Social Policy Report 6 (Spring 1992).
America has the highest divorce rate in the world. At present rates, approximately half of all U.S. marriages can be expected to end in divorce.Source: National Commission on Children, "Just the Facts: A Summary of Recent Information on America's Children and Their Families" (Washington D.C., 1993).
55% of all white children, and 75% of all black children born in the last two decades are likely to live some portion of their childhood with an absent father.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Divorce, Child Custody, and Child Support," Current Population Reports Ser p-23 No. 84 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1979); and L.L Bumpass and J.A. Sweet, "Children's Experience in Single-Parent Families: Implications of Cohabitation and Marital Transitions," Family Planning Perspectives 21 (1989), pp.256-260.
During the last three decades, the percentage of children living with a step-parent has climbed from 6.7% to 11.3%. More than 9 out of 10 step-children live with their biological mother and a stepfather.Source: David Popenoe, "The Evolution of Marriage and the Problem of Stepfamilies: A Biosocial Perspective," paper presented at the National Symposium on Stepfamilies at the Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA, October 14, 1993.
The proportion of children living with just one parent rose from 9% in 1960 to 25% in 1990.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Family Life Today...And How it has Changed" SB/92-13 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office: November 1992)
In 1993, 27% of children under 18 years old lived with only one parent, up from 12% in 1970.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Gap Narrows Between Children Living with a Divorced or Single Parent, Census Bureau Finds," by Arlene Saluter (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, July 20, 1994)
More than 90% of litigated divorces result in an award of sole custody to the mother.Source: 1991 Census Bureau
The number of children living only with mother grew from 8% (5.1 million) in 1960 to 23.3% (15.6 million) in 1993. Source: U.S. Congress, Committee on Ways and Means, "The Green Book" (Washington D.C., 1993); see also U.S. department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1993", by Arlene Saluter, Current Population Reports: Population Characteristics P20-478 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, May 1994).
The chances that a child born around 1980 will not be living with both biological parents at age 17 have increased to over 50%.Source: Donald J. Hernandez, "America's Children: Resources from Family, Government, and the Economy (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1993).
About 40% of the children who live in fatherless households haven't seen their fathers in at least a year. Of the remaining 60%, only 20% sleep even one night per month in the father's home. Only one in six sees their father an average of once or more per week.Source: Frank F. Furstenberg Jr. and Christing Winquist Nord, "Parenting Apart: Patterns of Child Rearing After Marital Disruption," Journal of Marriage and the Family (November 1985), p.896.
In disrupted families, only one child in six, on average, saw his or her father as often as once a week in the past year. Close to half did not see their father at all in the past year. As time goes on, contact becomes even more infrequent. Ten years after a marriage breaks up, more than two- thirds of children report not having seen their father for a year.Source: National Commission on Children, "Speaking of Kids: A National Survey of Children and Parents" (Washington, D.C., 1991).
With increasing numbers of children living with only their mothers, many children have tenuous or nonexistent relationships with their fathers. In a 1990 survey, only one-third of children in female-headed families reported seeing their fathers at least once a week. Nearly one in five children in female-headed families had not seen their fathers for five years.Source: National Commission on Children, "Speaking of Kids: A National Survey of Children and Parents (Washington, 1991).
The United States is now the world's leader in fatherless families. In 1986, the United States took over first place, when 24% of America's families were headed by a single parent, and today nearly 30% of families in the United States are headed by a single parent.Source: Alisa Burns, "Mother Headed Families: An International Perspective and the Case of Australia," Social Policy Report 6 (Spring 1992).
America has the highest divorce rate in the world. At present rates, approximately half of all U.S. marriages can be expected to end in divorce.Source: National Commission on Children, "Just the Facts: A Summary of Recent Information on America's Children and Their Families" (Washington D.C., 1993).
55% of all white children, and 75% of all black children born in the last two decades are likely to live some portion of their childhood with an absent father.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, "Divorce, Child Custody, and Child Support," Current Population Reports Ser p-23 No. 84 (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1979); and L.L Bumpass and J.A. Sweet, "Children's Experience in Single-Parent Families: Implications of Cohabitation and Marital Transitions," Family Planning Perspectives 21 (1989), pp.256-260.
During the last three decades, the percentage of children living with a step-parent has climbed from 6.7% to 11.3%. More than 9 out of 10 step-children live with their biological mother and a stepfather.Source: David Popenoe, "The Evolution of Marriage and the Problem of Stepfamilies: A Biosocial Perspective," paper presented at the National Symposium on Stepfamilies at the Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA, October 14, 1993.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
